State v. Urf

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Urf

524 So. 2d 1118, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1176, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1959, 1988 WL 45877

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 11, 1988

DocketNos. 87-1721, 88-797

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 524 So. 2d 1118 (State v. Urf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Urf, 524 So. 2d 1118, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1176, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1959, 1988 WL 45877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court granting Christine Urf’s motion to seal records. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the court’s agreement to seal its own records. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 336 So.2d 93 (Fla.1976). However, we do agree that the court exceeded its authority in ordering the sealing by law enforcement agencies of arrest and criminal history records, because Urf, having been adjudged guilty of the offenses in question, did not qualify for such extraordinary relief. §§ 943.058(2) and 943.058(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly the petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part and denied in part, and the circuit court is directed to correct its order of June 3, 1987, consistent with this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court granting Christine Urf’s motion to seal records. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the court’s agreement to seal its own records. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 336 So.2d 93 (Fla.1976). However, we do agree that the court exceeded its authority in ordering the sealing by law enforcement agencies of arrest and criminal history records, because Urf, having been adjudged guilty of the offenses in question, did not qualify for such extraordinary relief. §§ 943.058(2) and 943.058(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). Accordingly the petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part and denied in part, and the circuit court is directed to correct its order of June 3, 1987, consistent with this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

524 So. 2d 1118, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1176, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1959, 1988 WL 45877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-urf-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack