State v. Upton (Mandamus Proceeding)
This text of State v. Upton (Mandamus Proceeding) (State v. Upton (Mandamus Proceeding)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS
BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED
January 31, 2006
Anderson / Mudd v. Myers (S52971). Upon consideration by the court. Petitioners' request for oral argument is denied. Petitioners' arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 78 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035 are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure.
Anderson / Mudd v. Myers (S52972). Upon consideration by the court. Petitioners' request for oral argument is denied. Petitioners' arguments that the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition No. 79 (2006) does not comply substantially with ORS 250.035 are not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed measure.
CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS,
MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS
State v. Upton, George Washington (S52316). Peremptory writ of mandamus issued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Upton (Mandamus Proceeding), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-upton-mandamus-proceeding-or-2006.