State v. Uptgraft
This text of 54 N.E. 802 (State v. Uptgraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellees were charged by indictment with having committed the crime of perjury. Upon their motion, the court quashed the indictment over the exceptions of the State, and granted the latter sixty days in which to file a bill of exceptions.
No final judgment whatever appears to have been rendered and entered in the case, and the State seems to have appealed from the ruling of the court in sustaining the motion to quash the indictment.
The rule is well .affirmed that an appeal to this court, in a criminal cause, whether prosecuted by the State or defendant, must be taken from a final judgment; otherwise, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Erganbright v. State, 148 Ind. 180, and cases there cited. No final judgment having been rendered in this cause, the appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 N.E. 802, 153 Ind. 232, 1899 Ind. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-uptgraft-ind-1899.