State v. Upright
332 S.E.2d 82, 313 N.C. 610, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1864
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Ray Daniel UPRIGHT, Jerome Herman Fink and John Henry Russell.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Weinhold & McCanless, Salisbury, for defendant Ray Daniel Upright.
David E. Broome, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
Defendant's petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Upright, 332 S.E.2d 82, 313 N.C. 610, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1864 (N.C. 1985).
332 S.E.2d 82 (State v. Upright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.