State v. Upkins

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Upkins

2017 Ohio 2822, 74 N.E.3d 464, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1405

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 2017

Docket2016-1742

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 Ohio 2822 (State v. Upkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Upkins, 2017 Ohio 2822, 74 N.E.3d 464, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Shelby App. No. 17-16-04. Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law No. IV. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated as follows:

“When appellate counsel also served as trial counsel and moves to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, the court shall permit counsel to withdraw and must then appoint new appellate counsel to review the record and raise any honfrivolous appealable issue.”

O’Neill, J., would accept the cause on all propositions of law. O’Donnell, Kennedy, and DeWine, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelby App. No. 17-16-04. Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law No. IV. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated as follows:

“When appellate counsel also served as trial counsel and moves to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, the court shall permit counsel to withdraw and must then appoint new appellate counsel to review the record and raise any honfrivolous appealable issue.”

O’Neill, J., would accept the cause on all propositions of law. O’Donnell, Kennedy, and DeWine, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 Ohio 2822, 74 N.E.3d 464, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-upkins-ohio-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack