State v. Upkins

2017 Ohio 2822, 74 N.E.3d 464, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1405
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 2017·No. 2016-1742·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Shelby App. No. 17-16-04. Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law No. IV. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated as follows:

“When appellate counsel also served as trial counsel and moves to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, the court shall permit counsel to withdraw and must then appoint new appellate counsel to review the record and raise any honfrivolous appealable issue.”
O’Neill, J., would accept the cause on all propositions of law. O’Donnell, Kennedy, and DeWine, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Upkins, 2017 Ohio 2822, 74 N.E.3d 464, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2017).

2017 Ohio 2822 (State v. Upkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lawrence
2018 Ohio 3987 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)