State v. Upchurch

510 P.3d 290, 319 Or. App. 536
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 11, 2022
DocketA174702
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 510 P.3d 290 (State v. Upchurch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Upchurch, 510 P.3d 290, 319 Or. App. 536 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Submitted April 11, affirmed May 11, petition for review dismissed September 1, 2022 (370 Or 213)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RICHARD PIERSON UPCHURCH, aka Richard Upchurch, Defendant-Appellant. Lake County Circuit Court 20CR07635, 20CR13765; A174702 (Control), A174703 510 P3d 290

David M. Vandenberg, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Powers, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Davis-McCoy, 300 Or App 326, 454 P3d 48 (2019); State v. Merrill, 311 Or App 487, 492 P3d 722, adh’d to as modified on recons, 314 Or App 460, 495 P3d 219 (2021); and State v. Redick, 312 Or App 260, 491 P3d 87 (2021).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Valdovinos-Moreno
510 P.3d 290 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 P.3d 290, 319 Or. App. 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-upchurch-orctapp-2022.