State v. Unrein

372 P.2d 547, 60 Wash. 2d 168, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 288
Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1962·No. 35391·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having been found guilty of charges of burglary in the second degree and assault in the third *169 degree, defendant appeals from his judgment and sentence and alleges one assignment of error: that he “ . . . was denied his right to a speedy trial ...”

In a long line of decisions, commencing with State ex rel. Repath v. Caldwell, 9 Wash. 336, 37 Pac. 669 (1894) —the latest being State v. Moore, ante p. 144, 372 P. (2d) 536 (1962) — this court has held that the discharge of an accused for want of prosecution, pursuant to RCW 10.46.010, is not a bar to further prosecution for a felony upon the same charge. RCW 10.43.010.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Unrein, 372 P.2d 547, 60 Wash. 2d 168, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 288 (Wash. 1962).

372 P.2d 547 (State v. Unrein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McMains
497 P.2d 962 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1972)
State v. McEvers
454 P.2d 832 (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Jestes
448 P.2d 917 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Wells
433 P.2d 869 (Washington Supreme Court, 1967)