State v. United Cork Companies
176 A. 142, 117 N.J. Eq. 437, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 659
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 116 N. J. Eq. 4.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. United Cork Companies, 176 A. 142, 117 N.J. Eq. 437, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 659 (N.J. 1935).
176 A. 142 (State v. United Cork Companies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STATE EX REL. BD. OF HEALTH v. Sommers Rendering Co.
169 A.2d 165 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.
43 A.2d 15 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Benton v. Kernan
6 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)