State v. Unick

814 N.E.2d 485, 103 Ohio St. 3d 103
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 2004·No. No. 2004-0653·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Unick, 814 N.E.2d 485, 103 Ohio St. 3d 103 (Ohio 2004).

814 N.E.2d 485 (State v. Unick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thompson
809 N.E.2d 1134 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)