State v. Unger
140 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 448, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 237
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Unger. Read the opinion of the Court — 103 N.J.L. 18 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yak Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Unger, 140 A. 922, 104 N.J.L. 448, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1928).
140 A. 922 (State v. Unger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.