State v. Ui

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ui. Read the opinion of the Court — 418 P.3d 628
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 2016·No. SCWC-15-0000402·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000402 01-SEP-2016 10:05 AM

SCWC-15-0000402

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RACHEL VIAMOANA UI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000402; CASE NO. 3DTA-11-02996)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Rachel Viamoana Ui’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on July 20, 2016, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 1, 2016. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ui, (haw 2016).

State v. Ui (State v. Ui) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.