State v. . Twitty
2 N.C. 102
Opinion
Upon evidence it appeared that Twitty broke open, in the night-time, a little outhouse, about 17 1/2 feet from the dwelling-house, and took out the brandy, etc., and it was insisted on the part of the prisoner that this was not burglary. The indictment lays it to be a mansion-house; but it has been determined that where the jury find the house to be separated *Page 76 from the dwelling-house only 8 feet, and that the breaking and entering was in that house, it is not burglary; and cited an authority from Leach, who has a case to that effect.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Twitty, 2 N.C. 102 (N.C. Ct. App. 1794).
2 N.C. 102 (State v. . Twitty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jones
655 S.E.2d 915 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Blue
550 S.E.2d 6 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
State v. Merritt
463 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
State v. Woods
427 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
State v. Fields
337 S.E.2d 518 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)