Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Tutson

State v. Tutson

861 A.2d 511, 271 Conn. 935, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 481
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 19, 2004
DocketSC 17287
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 861 A.2d 511 (State v. Tutson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tutson, 861 A.2d 511, 271 Conn. 935, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 481 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn. App. [936]*936610 (AC 24066), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17287. Decided October 19, 2004 Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Mark Rademacher, assistant public defender, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was entitled to a new trial because the trial court’s ruling improperly precluded his proffered alibi evidence under Practice Book § 40-21?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tutson v. Commissioner of Correction
72 A.3d 1162 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Tutson
899 A.2d 598 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 A.2d 511, 271 Conn. 935, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tutson-conn-2004.