Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . Turpin

State v. . Turpin

164 S.E. 926, 203 N.C. 11, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 299
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 164 S.E. 926 (State v. . Turpin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Turpin, 164 S.E. 926, 203 N.C. 11, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 299 (N.C. 1932).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The evidence respecting the reputation of defendant’s garage for selling liquor was hearsay and should have been excluded. S. v. Springs, 184 N. C., 768, 114 S. E., 851; S. v. Mills, 184 N. C., 694, 114 S. E., 314. The identical question was before the Court in the two cases just cited. Further discussion would only call for a repetition of what was said in these cases.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Weldon
333 S.E.2d 701 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
State v. Tessnear
144 S.E.2d 43 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 926, 203 N.C. 11, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-turpin-nc-1932.