State v. Turner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Turner

279 S.E.2d 130, 276 S.C. 414, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 405

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 4, 1981

Docket21478

StatusPublished

This text of 279 S.E.2d 130 (State v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Turner, 279 S.E.2d 130, 276 S.C. 414, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 405 (S.C. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant was convicted of housebreaking and assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct. He asserts the trial court erred in permitting reference to' allegations of prior sexual assault charges against appellant. We agree and reverse.

’ The court permitted, prior to appellant testifying the following allegations of misconduct not connected with this .case........

(1) Warrant for rape.

(2) Warrant for housebreaking and assault.

(3) Warrant for sexual assault.

(4) Warrant for housebreaking and assault.

The disposition of the above charges are not revealed by the record. We held in State v. Wilson, S. C., 266 S. E. (2d) 426, 427 (1980), “the danger of prejudice is enhanced when, as here, there has been no trial and conviction . . .” The manifest prejudice of the evidence is obvious. A new trial must be granted.

Reversed.

Lewis, C. J., and Littlejohn, Ness and Harwell, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI