State v. Turner

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Turner

711 N.E.2d 1007, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2185

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 28, 1999

Docket99-1166

StatusPublished

This text of 711 N.E.2d 1007 (State v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Turner, 711 N.E.2d 1007, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2185 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 97APA05-709. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On June 21, 1999, appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction that exceeds the page limitation prescribed by S.Ct.Prac.R. III(1)(C). Whereas appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. Ill within the time for perfecting his appeal, and whereas, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), appellant’s failure to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction within the prescribed time period divests this court of jurisdiction to hear the appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 97APA05-709. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On June 21, 1999, appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction that exceeds the page limitation prescribed by S.Ct.Prac.R. III(1)(C). Whereas appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with S.Ct.Prac.R. Ill within the time for perfecting his appeal, and whereas, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), appellant’s failure to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction within the prescribed time period divests this court of jurisdiction to hear the appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 N.E.2d 1007, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-turner-ohio-1999.