State v. Turner

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Turner

124 S.W.3d 52, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 56, 2004 WL 76590

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 2004·No. No. WD 62459·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Turner appeals his conviction for second degree assault, Section 565.060 RSMo 2000, and sentence of twelve years imprisonment. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor’s improper remarks during closing argument. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Turner appeals his conviction for second degree assault, Section 565.060 RSMo 2000, and sentence of twelve years imprisonment. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor’s improper remarks during closing argument. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Turner, 124 S.W.3d 52, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 56, 2004 WL 76590 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

124 S.W.3d 52 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.