State v. Turner
This text of 35 La. Ann. 1103 (State v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was. delivered by
The defendants were convicted of larceny, and appeal from a sentence of twelve months’ imprisonment at hard labor.
They rely solely upon an alleged error in the following portion of the charge of the Judge to the jury, to-wit:
“ That it is not necessary that a warrant should have been issued, in order that an arrest could be made. That any sheriff, constable, peace officer or even a private citizen can make an arrest when he sees the person arrested perpetrating a crime, or about to escape, with the understanding that he arrests a criminal, and not an innocent person.” The issue tried was whether the defendants had stolen the property charged in the indictment. We are at a loss to see what possible influence the charge in question could have had on the minds of the jury, touching the issue on trial, that is, the guilt or innocence of the accused. Besides, the Judge explains satisfactorily in the bill of exceptions why the above clause objected to was embodied in his charge. The appeal is wholly without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 La. Ann. 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-turner-la-1883.