State v. Turner

193 A.3d 48, 330 Conn. 909
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 20, 2018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 535, 187 A.3d 454 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the petitioner was not entitled to review, under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), of his unpreserved claim that the trial court improperly admitted cell tower coverage maps?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the petitioner was not entitled to plain error review of his unpreserved claim that the trial court improperly admitted cell tower coverage maps?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Turner, 193 A.3d 48, 330 Conn. 909 (Colo. 2018).

193 A.3d 48 (State v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2026
State v. Turner
334 Conn. 660 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)