State v. Turk

194 N.E. 453, 129 Ohio St. 245, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 245, 2 Ohio Op. 88, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 361
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 1935·No. 24919·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

On consideration whereof Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., reach the conclusion that no prejudicial error has intervened, and that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed on authority of Robbins v. State, 8 Ohio St., 131. Weygandt, C. J., Day and Zimmerman, JJ., are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed and the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed. Williams, J., having sat by designation as a member of the Court of Appeals that heard and decided this case, and whose record is now before this court for consideration, does not participate. The court being thus equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephenson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Williams, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Turk, 194 N.E. 453, 129 Ohio St. 245, 129 Ohio St. (N.S.) 245, 2 Ohio Op. 88, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 361 (Ohio 1935).

194 N.E. 453 (State v. Turk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Iowa v. Keyon Harrison
914 N.W.2d 178 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2018)
Gray v. State
463 P.2d 897 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. Farmer
156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 214 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1951)
State v. Salter
78 N.E.2d 575 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1948)
Jordon v. United States
87 F.2d 64 (D.C. Circuit, 1936)