State v. Tunick

959 A.2d 1011, 289 Conn. 943
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 30, 2008·No. 18262·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

959 A.2d 1011 (2008)
289 Conn. 943

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Stephen TUNICK.

No. 18262.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 30, 2008.

Richard Emanuel, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn.App. 611, 952 A.2d 103 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant's conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?"

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18262.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tunick, 959 A.2d 1011, 289 Conn. 943 (Colo. 2008).

959 A.2d 1011 (State v. Tunick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tunick
992 A.2d 326 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)