State v. Tunick
This text of 959 A.2d 1011 (State v. Tunick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Stephen TUNICK.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Richard Emanuel, New Haven, in support of the petition.
Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 109 Conn.App. 611, 952 A.2d 103 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court improperly affirm the defendant's conviction, without first remanding the case to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether the trial judge had actively participated in pretrial negotiations?"
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18262.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
959 A.2d 1011, 289 Conn. 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tunick-conn-2008.