State v. Tui

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Tui. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Haw. 462
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 18, 2016·No. SCWC-15-0000387·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000387 18-FEB-2016

SCWC-15-0000387

10:34 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JOSEPH TUI, Jr., Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, DIRECTOR OF HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF HAWAII, Petitioner/Real Party-in-Interest-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000387; CR. NOS. 13-1-0371 AND 13-1-0556)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ayabe in place of Wilson, J., recused)

Petitioner/Real Party-in-Interest-Appellant Director of Health, Department of Health, State of Hawaii’s application for writ of certiorari filed on January 7, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 18, 2016.

Debbie L. Tanakaya /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Bert I. Ayabe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tui, (haw 2016).

State v. Tui (State v. Tui) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.