State v. Tucker
This text of 2018 ND 4 (State v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 1/22/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2018 ND 4
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
David Ryan Tucker, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170278
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Andrew C. Eyre (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, and Jenna Bergman (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Tucker
[¶1] David Tucker appeals a criminal judgment entered after a bench trial finding him guilty of robbery, a class B felony. On appeal, Tucker argues the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tucker-nd-2018.