State v. Tucker

367 S.W.3d 674, 2012 WL 2107275, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 788
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2012·No. No. ED 96849·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Tucker appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062,1 and two counts of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and discern no plain error. State v. Speaks, 298 S.W.3d 70, 85 (Mo.App. E.D.[675]*6752009). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tucker, 367 S.W.3d 674, 2012 WL 2107275, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 788 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

367 S.W.3d 674 (State v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ronald Tucker v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015
Tucker v. State
468 S.W.3d 468 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015)