State v. Tucker

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Tucker

367 S.W.3d 674, 2012 WL 2107275, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 788

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 12, 2012

DocketNo. ED 96849

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 367 S.W.3d 674 (State v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tucker, 367 S.W.3d 674, 2012 WL 2107275, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 788 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Tucker appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062,¹ and two counts of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and discern no plain error. State v. Speaks, 298 S.W.3d 70, 85 (Mo.App. E.D.[675]*6752009). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Tucker appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062,¹ and two counts of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and discern no plain error. State v. Speaks, 298 S.W.3d 70, 85 (Mo.App. E.D.[675]*6752009). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

367 S.W.3d 674, 2012 WL 2107275, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tucker-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack