State v. Tucker

728 A.2d 1097, 248 Conn. 668, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 136
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 18, 1999·No. SC 16032·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the [669] parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification1 was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tucker, 728 A.2d 1097, 248 Conn. 668, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 136 (Colo. 1999).

728 A.2d 1097 (State v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Robert H.
866 A.2d 1255 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Santapaola v. Ashcroft
249 F. Supp. 2d 181 (D. Connecticut, 2003)
State v. Robert H.
802 A.2d 152 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
State v. Burton
778 A.2d 955 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
State v. Davidson
750 A.2d 1106 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
In re Michael L.
745 A.2d 847 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)