State v. Tucker
728 A.2d 1097, 248 Conn. 668, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 136
Opinion
Opinion
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the [669] parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification1 was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Tucker, 728 A.2d 1097, 248 Conn. 668, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 136 (Colo. 1999).
728 A.2d 1097 (State v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Robert H.
866 A.2d 1255 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Santapaola v. Ashcroft
249 F. Supp. 2d 181 (D. Connecticut, 2003)
State v. Robert H.
802 A.2d 152 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
State v. Burton
778 A.2d 955 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)
State v. Davidson
750 A.2d 1106 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
In re Michael L.
745 A.2d 847 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)