State v. Truvia

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Truvia

592 So. 2d 813, 1992 WL 25255

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 14, 1992

DocketNo. 91-KH-0503

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 813 (State v. Truvia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Truvia, 592 So. 2d 813, 1992 WL 25255 (La. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Truvia, Auggie; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “E” Number 278-472.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The district court is ordered to grant relator an out-of-time appeal and appoint counsel to handle the appeal. See Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990). If appointed counsel, after review of the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may follow the procedure outlined in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990).

WATSON and COLE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Truvia, Auggie; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “E” Number 278-472.

PER CURIAM.

Granted. The district court is ordered to grant relator an out-of-time appeal and appoint counsel to handle the appeal. See Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990). If appointed counsel, after review of the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may follow the procedure outlined in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990).

WATSON and COLE, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 813, 1992 WL 25255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-truvia-la-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack