State v. Truss

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Truss

309 So. 2d 678, 1975 La. LEXIS 3656

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 21, 1975

DocketNo. 55979

StatusPublished

This text of 309 So. 2d 678 (State v. Truss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Truss, 309 So. 2d 678, 1975 La. LEXIS 3656 (La. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Dannie Paul Truss, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a Stay Order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Donovan W. Parker, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of E. Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 11th day of April, 1975, the record in du[679]*679plicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of June, 1975, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Dannie Paul Truss, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a Stay Order.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Donovan W. Parker, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of E. Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 11th day of April, 1975, the record in du[679]*679plicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of June, 1975, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 So. 2d 678, 1975 La. LEXIS 3656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-truss-la-1975.