State v. Trujillo

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Trujillo. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 N.M. 724
New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2014·No. 32,755·Unpublished

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 32,755

5 NICHOLAS JOHN TRUJILLO,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY 8 John W. Pope, District Judge

9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Nicholas John Trujillo 13 Santa Rosa, NM

14 Pro Se Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 WECHSLER, Judge. 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________ 7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

11 _________________________________ 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Trujillo, (N.M. Ct. App. 2014).

State v. Trujillo (State v. Trujillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.