State v. Trujillo
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. NO. 32,755
5 NICHOLAS JOHN TRUJILLO,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY 8 John W. Pope, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Appellee
12 Nicholas John Trujillo 13 Santa Rosa, NM
14 Pro Se Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION
16 WECHSLER, Judge. 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has
3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
11 _________________________________ 12 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Trujillo (State v. Trujillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.