State v. Troutman

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Troutman

97 S.W. 873, 199 Mo. 255, 1906 Mo. LEXIS 304

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided November 20, 1906·Published

Opinion

BURGESS, P. J.

The prosecuting attorney of Buchanan county filed an information in the criminal court of that county charging the defendant, James Troutman, Robert Kearney and David Masner, jointly with robbery in the first degree. Thereafter upon the motion of defendant a severance was granted him, and upon trial had he was found guilty as charged and his punishment fixed at five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. He appeals.

No bill of exceptions was filed in this ease, so that there is nothing before us for review except the record proper.

[256]*256The information is well enough, and the record free from error. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURGESS, P. J.

The prosecuting attorney of Buchanan county filed an information in the criminal court of that county charging the defendant, James Troutman, Robert Kearney and David Masner, jointly with robbery in the first degree. Thereafter upon the motion of defendant a severance was granted him, and upon trial had he was found guilty as charged and his punishment fixed at five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. He appeals.

No bill of exceptions was filed in this ease, so that there is nothing before us for review except the record proper.

[256]*256The information is well enough, and the record free from error. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

All concur.

State v. Troutman, 97 S.W. 873, 199 Mo. 255, 1906 Mo. LEXIS 304 (Mo. 1906).

Pincite

97 S.W. 873 (State v. Troutman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.