State v. Trotter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Trotter

534 S.W.3d 418

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 5, 2017

DocketNo. ED 103592

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 418 (State v. Trotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Trotter, 534 S.W.3d 418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Carlden Trotter appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections, Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Carlden Trotter appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of violence against an employee of the Department of Corrections, Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-trotter-moctapp-2017.