Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Trotman

State v. Trotman

186 So. 3d 43, 2016 WL 627883
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 2016
DocketNo. 4D15-564
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 So. 3d 43 (State v. Trotman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Trotman, 186 So. 3d 43, 2016 WL 627883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the county court’s order finding the mandatory $5,000 civil penalty imposed for solicitation of prostitution under section 796.07(6), Florida Statutes (2014), to be unconstitutionally excessive. See State v. Vachon, 182 So.3d 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); State v. Jones, 180 So.3d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

CIKLIN, C.J., GERBER, J., and JOHNSON, LAURA, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida v. Rupert Rolle
192 So. 3d 717 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 43, 2016 WL 627883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-trotman-fladistctapp-2016.