State v. Trosper
This text of 75 P. 1134 (State v. Trosper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant appeals from a conviction for selling intoxicating liquors and maintaining a nuisance. Errors are predicated on the giving of certain instructions, refusing to give others requested by appellant, and in overruling appellant’s application for a continuance of the trial.
The instructions given are not subject to the criticism made, and fairly state the law; those refused which contain a correct statement of the law were substantially embodied in the instructions given by the court. There was no prejudice resulting to the appellant by reason of the court’s refusal to grant a continuance, even if the application be considered sufficient. An examination of the record discloses no prejudicial error, in the proceedings as against the appellant.
The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 P. 1134, 68 Kan. 821, 1904 Kan. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-trosper-kan-1904.