State v. Trimble
This text of 2015 ND 80 (State v. Trimble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/8/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2015 ND 80
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Brandon Glenn Trimble, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20140349
Appeal from the District Court of LaMoure County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tonya Duffy, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5, Lamoure, ND 58458, for plaintiff and appellee.
Scott Orel Diamond, 210 Broadway, Suite 401B, Fargo, ND 58102, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Trimble
[¶1] Brandon Glenn Trimble appeals from an amended criminal judgment. Trimble argues the district court erred by finding Trimble violated his probation by accessing the internet and by residing away from his home overnight without his probation officer’s permission. Trimble requests a remand for resentencing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4), concluding the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the district court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked Trimble’s probation.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 ND 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-trimble-nd-2015.