State v. Trice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Trice

209 S.W.3d 52, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1947, 2006 WL 3718008

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2006·No. No. ED 87445·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Trice (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of statutory rape in the first degree, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000, for which he was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Trice (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of statutory rape in the first degree, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000, for which he was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Trice, 209 S.W.3d 52, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1947, 2006 WL 3718008 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

209 S.W.3d 52 (State v. Trice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related