State v. Trice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Trice

867 S.W.2d 717, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2007, 1993 WL 532898

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1993·No. Nos. 62165, 63777·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for first degree assault and armed criminal action as well as the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm. We further find no precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion and affirm by written order. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b)(2). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for first degree assault and armed criminal action as well as the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no error, we affirm. We further find no precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion and affirm by written order. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b)(2). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

State v. Trice, 867 S.W.2d 717, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2007, 1993 WL 532898 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

867 S.W.2d 717 (State v. Trice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.