Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Trax

State v. Trax

78 P.3d 114, 190 Or. App. 130, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1353
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 15, 2003
Docket97CR2980FA; A105215; 97CR2980FB; A105216
StatusPublished

This text of 78 P.3d 114 (State v. Trax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Trax, 78 P.3d 114, 190 Or. App. 130, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1353 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case is before us following remand from the Oregon Supreme Court. State v. Trax, 335 Or 597, 75 P3d 440 (2003). The only remaining issue on remand warranting a published discussion concerns the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motions to controvert. We reject defendants’ contentions in that regard and adopt the reasoning for rejecting those contentions set forth in Chief Judge Deits’s dissenting opinion in our initial decision in this case. State v. Trax, 179 Or App 193, 219-21, 39 P3d 887 (2002) (Deits, C. J., dissenting).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Trax
75 P.3d 440 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2003)
State v. Trax
39 P.3d 887 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 P.3d 114, 190 Or. App. 130, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-trax-orctapp-2003.