State v. Tran

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Tran

528 S.W.3d 915

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 26, 2017

DocketWD 79177

StatusPublished

This text of 528 S.W.3d 915 (State v. Tran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Tran, 528 S.W.3d 915 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

John Tran appeals from his convictions for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, Tran contends the circuit court erred in not allowing defense counsel to cross-examine a witness about a prior inconsistent statement. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam

John Tran appeals from his convictions for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, Tran contends the circuit court erred in not allowing defense counsel to cross-examine a witness about a prior inconsistent statement. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 S.W.3d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tran-moctapp-2017.