State v. Townsend

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Townsend

478 S.W.3d 529, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1291, 2015 WL 8924024

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 15, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102201

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 478 S.W.3d 529 (State v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Townsend, 478 S.W.3d 529, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1291, 2015 WL 8924024 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willetta Townsend appeals .from the judgment entered on her convictions after a jury trial for robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was sufficient evidence to support these convictions, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons .for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willetta Townsend appeals .from the judgment entered on her convictions after a jury trial for robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. There was sufficient evidence to support these convictions, and we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons .for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

478 S.W.3d 529, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1291, 2015 WL 8924024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-townsend-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack