State v. Townsend

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Townsend

869 S.W.2d 922, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 205, 1994 WL 35536

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 8, 1994

DocketNo. 62591

StatusPublished

This text of 869 S.W.2d 922 (State v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Townsend, 869 S.W.2d 922, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 205, 1994 WL 35536 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Townsend appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter in violation of Section 565.024 RSMo 1986 and armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent, and class X offender pursuant to Sections 558.016, 557.036.4, and 558.019, to concurrent terms of twenty years imprisonment on both counts.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Townsend appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter in violation of Section 565.024 RSMo 1986 and armed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent, and class X offender pursuant to Sections 558.016, 557.036.4, and 558.019, to concurrent terms of twenty years imprisonment on both counts.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

869 S.W.2d 922, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 205, 1994 WL 35536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-townsend-moctapp-1994.