State v. Townsend

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Townsend

264 So. 3d 448

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 25, 2019·No. No. 2019-KH-0093·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant represents that the court of appeal has failed to act timely on a supervisory writ application or applications filed on or about July 23, 2018. If defendant's representation is correct, the court of appeal is ordered to consider and act on the writ application(s). The court of appeal is also ordered to provide this court with a copy of its judgment.

Guidry, J., would deny.

Clark, J., would deny.

Crichton, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Defendant represents that the court of appeal has failed to act timely on a supervisory writ application or applications filed on or about July 23, 2018. If defendant's representation is correct, the court of appeal is ordered to consider and act on the writ application(s). The court of appeal is also ordered to provide this court with a copy of its judgment.

Guidry, J., would deny.

Clark, J., would deny.

Crichton, J., recused.

State v. Townsend, 264 So. 3d 448 (La. 2019).

Pincite

264 So. 3d 448 (State v. Townsend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.