State v. Toth

369 N.W.2d 644, 220 Neb. 311, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1114
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 28, 1985·No. 84-775·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Michael G. Toth appeals the judgment of the district court for York County, Nebraska, affirming Toth’s conviction in a bench trial for theft by shoplifting property having a value greater than $100 but less than $300. See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-511.01 and 28-518 (Cum. Supp. 1984).

Toth’s brief filed with this court fails to specify any *312 assignment of error to be reviewed. The record does not disclose any plain error prejudicial to Toth. In the absence of any error presented for review, we must and do affirm the judgment of the district court. See State v. Hoekstra, ante p. 309, 369 N.W.2d 643 (1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Toth, 369 N.W.2d 644, 220 Neb. 311, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1114 (Neb. 1985).

369 N.W.2d 644 (State v. Toth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rubek
371 N.W.2d 115 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)