State v. Torres

632 A.2d 698, 227 Conn. 906, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 325
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 15, 1993·No. SC 14838·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 443 (AC 10922), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that an inadequate record barred review of the defendant’s unpreserved claim that a sniff by a police dog of the exterior of the defendant’s stopped car was a search that was in violation of the state and federal constitutions because it was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the dog sniff a search under either the federal or state constitution that was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Torres, 632 A.2d 698, 227 Conn. 906, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 325 (Colo. 1993).

632 A.2d 698 (State v. Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Torres
645 A.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)