State v. Torres
This text of 632 A.2d 698 (State v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 443 (AC 10922), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“ 1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that an inadequate record barred review of the defendant’s unpreserved claim that a sniff by a police dog of the exterior of the defendant’s stopped car was a search that was in violation of the state and federal constitutions because it was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion?
“2. If the answer to question 1. is no, was the dog sniff a search under either the federal or state constitution that was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
632 A.2d 698, 227 Conn. 906, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-torres-conn-1993.