State v. Toone

743 S.E.2d 222, 366 N.C. 593, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 507, 2013 WL 3059259
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 12, 2013·No. 137P13·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se Motion for PDR (COAP11-1079)

2. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

3. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Dismissed

2. Allowed

3. Dismissed as Moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Toone, 743 S.E.2d 222, 366 N.C. 593, 2013 N.C. LEXIS 507, 2013 WL 3059259 (N.C. 2013).

743 S.E.2d 222 (State v. Toone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.