State v. Tompkins

684 P.2d 629, 69 Or. App. 258, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3878
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 18, 1984·No. 10-82-08958; CA A28553·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. The trial court, as a part of the sentence, ordered defendant to repay the costs of his defense within 12 months. However, the court did not indicate what amount was to be repaid. This was error. State v. Stock, 56 Or App 857, 643 P2d 877 (1982).

Affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tompkins, 684 P.2d 629, 69 Or. App. 258, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3878 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

684 P.2d 629 (State v. Tompkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gage
773 P.2d 1362 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)
State v. Moore
773 P.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)