State v. Tompkins
684 P.2d 629, 69 Or. App. 258, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3878
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 18, 1984
Docket10-82-08958; CA A28553
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 684 P.2d 629 (State v. Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Tompkins, 684 P.2d 629, 69 Or. App. 258, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3878 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. The trial court, as a part of the sentence, ordered defendant to repay the costs of his defense within 12 months. However, the court did not indicate what amount was to be repaid. This was error. State v. Stock, 56 Or App 857, 643 P2d 877 (1982).
Affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Gage
773 P.2d 1362 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)
State v. Moore
773 P.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
684 P.2d 629, 69 Or. App. 258, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tompkins-orctapp-1984.