State v. Tolliver

936 S.W.2d 178, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2004, 1996 WL 705836
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 1996·No. Nos. 67685, 69856·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marlon Tolliver (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years’ imprisonment and from the denial without hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tolliver, 936 S.W.2d 178, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2004, 1996 WL 705836 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

936 S.W.2d 178 (State v. Tolliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.