State v. Toliver

282 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2009 WL 1492896
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2009·No. ED 90866·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Toliver, the appellant, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving while revoked in violation of Section 302.321 RSMo (2004). He was sentenced to five years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in allowing his trial counsel to withdraw and in denying his motion for a continuance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Toliver, 282 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2009 WL 1492896 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

282 S.W.3d 883 (State v. Toliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinzerl v. Weinzerl
282 S.W.3d 883 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)