State v. Toliver

282 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2009 WL 1492896
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 14, 2009
DocketED 90866
StatusPublished

This text of 282 S.W.3d 883 (State v. Toliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Toliver, 282 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2009 WL 1492896 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles Toliver, the appellant, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving while revoked in violation of Section 302.321 RSMo (2004). He was sentenced to five years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in allowing his trial counsel to withdraw and in denying his motion for a continuance.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weinzerl v. Weinzerl
282 S.W.3d 883 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 S.W.3d 883, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 683, 2009 WL 1492896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-toliver-moctapp-2009.