Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State v. Toler

State v. Toler

196 S.E.2d 295, 18 N.C. App. 149, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1805
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMay 9, 1973
DocketNo. 732SC283
StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.E.2d 295 (State v. Toler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Toler, 196 S.E.2d 295, 18 N.C. App. 149, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1805 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

We have carefully examined all assignments of error and have considered all questions discussed in defendant’s brief and find no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial or in the judgment imposed. There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict. The sentence imposed was within statutory limits. G.S. 20-28; G.S. 14-3. It was permissible for the Superior Court to impose a sentence in excess of the one imposed in the District Court. State v. Tuggle, 17 N.C. App. 329, 194 S.E. 2d 50.

No error.

Judges Brock and Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tuggle
194 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 S.E.2d 295, 18 N.C. App. 149, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-toler-ncctapp-1973.