State v. Toler
196 S.E.2d 295, 18 N.C. App. 149, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1805
Opinion
We have carefully examined all assignments of error and have considered all questions discussed in defendant’s brief and find no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial or in the judgment imposed. There was ample evidence to sustain the verdict. The sentence imposed was within statutory limits. G.S. 20-28; G.S. 14-3. It was permissible for the Superior Court to impose a sentence in excess of the one imposed in the District Court. State v. Tuggle, 17 N.C. App. 329, 194 S.E. 2d 50.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Toler, 196 S.E.2d 295, 18 N.C. App. 149, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1805 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).
196 S.E.2d 295 (State v. Toler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Tuggle
194 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)