State v. Toler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Toler

843 S.W.2d 410, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 1993 WL 488

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Toler. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1856 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 5, 1993·No. Nos. 59285, 61764·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from a conviction of tampering in the first degree in violation of § 569.080.1(2) RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals from a denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from a conviction of tampering in the first degree in violation of § 569.080.1(2) RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals from a denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Toler, 843 S.W.2d 410, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 13, 1993 WL 488 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

843 S.W.2d 410 (State v. Toler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.