State v. Toledo

459 So. 2d 1179, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2631, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16621
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1984·No. No. 84-2381·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state seeks certiorari review of an order setting a supersedeas bond pending the defendant’s appeal of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850. Since, as we squarely held in State v. Matrascia, 377 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), the trial court has no authority to grant such relief, the petition is granted and the order is quashed.1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Toledo, 459 So. 2d 1179, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2631, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16621 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

459 So. 2d 1179 (State v. Toledo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Matrascia
377 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)