State v. Toledo
459 So. 2d 1179, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2631, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16621
This text of 459 So. 2d 1179 (State v. Toledo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Toledo, 459 So. 2d 1179, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2631, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16621 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
The state seeks certiorari review of an order setting a supersedeas bond pending the defendant’s appeal of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850. Since, as we squarely held in State v. Matrascia, 377 So.2d 997 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), the trial court has no authority to grant such relief, the petition is granted and the order is quashed.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Matrascia
377 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
459 So. 2d 1179, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2631, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-toledo-fladistctapp-1984.