State v. Todd Shipyards Corp.

343 S.W.2d 241, 162 Tex. 8, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 273, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 669
Texas Supreme Court·Decided February 8, 1961·No. No. A-8150·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the decision in this case is controlled by Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578, 17 S. Ct. 427, 41 L. ed. 832 and St. Louis Cotton Compress Company v. [9]*9State of Arkansas, 260 U. S. 346, 43 S. Ct. 125, 67 L. ed. 297. We are unwilling to take the position that in view of Osborn v. Ozlin, 310 U. S. 53, 60 S. Ct. 758, 84 L. ed. 1074 and Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen, 318 U. S. 313, 63 S. Ct. 602, 87 L. ed. 777, the Supreme Court of the United States will probably overrule the Allgeyer and Cotton Compress cases. We abide by what the Supreme Court has held and refuse to speculate upon what said Court may hold.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 343 S.W.2d 241, 162 Tex. 8, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 273, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 669 (Tex. 1961).

343 S.W.2d 241 (State v. Todd Shipyards Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related